View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Xeros Developing Poster
Joined: 31 Dec 2009 Posts: 11
|
Posted: Sat Jan 02, 2010 7:56 pm Post subject: Starcraft |
|
|
Okay, so when I first plyed this game, I thought of Starcraft. I personally love Starcraft. I probably think starcraft's way of making and using nukes would be best. It take well over 3 mins to upgrade and make it available, and it would also be needing a targeting mobile unit XD. _________________ The Soldiers Fight the War, but the Generals get the Credit. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
N@TE Chief Administrator Emeritus
Joined: 06 Dec 2009 Posts: 985 Location: Colorado
|
Posted: Mon Jan 04, 2010 2:20 pm Post subject: Nukes |
|
|
Well I think that in order to have nukes, you would have to have airplanes. Maybe just one airplane added to the VTS called B12 bomber or something. You would have to upgrade TWICE to get this as well. Then that way, the planes carrying the nukes would have to be fairly easy to be shot down. Also, the nukes couldn't be too powerful, maybe just enough to destroy 2 or 3 buildings, depending on how close together they are. Maybe like a 10x10 area or even a 5x5 are. What would shoot down the airplanes carrying nukes? Air turrets or cyclopses because cyclopses are already like cannons, and the have great range. _________________ Warfare Incorporated Former Head of Administration || Steam username: WINate |
|
Back to top |
|
|
galm ForeRunner
Joined: 18 Oct 2009 Posts: 2382 Location: New York
|
Posted: Mon Jan 04, 2010 6:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
idk about the whole nukes thing, then nate u could spam the planes and drop like twenty because they would get through, maybe a lower limit. _________________ "All held the finite and infinite as unrelated. None could foresee that the history of the two would become one." |
|
Back to top |
|
|
remoon101 Developing Poster
Joined: 28 Dec 2009 Posts: 13
|
Posted: Tue Jan 05, 2010 5:53 pm Post subject: -_- |
|
|
-_-
nukes sound good but... _________________ -My sword is the T-29 Broadsword, balanced for attack and defense, easy to use in crushing thrusts or turning aside enemy blows. Once your guard is down and your units swept aside, your buildings crumble under salvos of mortar fire- |
|
Back to top |
|
|
elamre Mega-Poster
Joined: 15 Dec 2008 Posts: 402 Location: the netherlands
|
Posted: Fri Jan 08, 2010 7:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
but...? >> dun dun dunnnn _________________ Hardcore |
|
Back to top |
|
|
trineroks Chief Administrator
Joined: 16 Oct 2009 Posts: 1770 Location: Southern Cali (UCLA)
|
Posted: Thu Mar 04, 2010 10:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
There should be nukes I play Starcraft too and I love the "nuclear launch detected"
there should be a countdown to a nuke launch like red alert 2 and you could counter it with air units!! Then we could have nukes AND air units! _________________ It's the essence of combat; kill, or be killed.
---------------------------------
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
galm ForeRunner
Joined: 18 Oct 2009 Posts: 2382 Location: New York
|
Posted: Thu Mar 04, 2010 4:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Ignoring the fact this thread is old there hasn't been any development to this game that's major since multiplayer, and sadly scott I'm starting to lose hope, u told me there would be more to come in November, and it's kinda been a while:( I really do hope I'm wrong but this is just what I'm thinking. _________________ "All held the finite and infinite as unrelated. None could foresee that the history of the two would become one." |
|
Back to top |
|
|
delta1 Very Active User
Joined: 19 Dec 2009 Posts: 182 Location: New york
|
Posted: Mon Mar 08, 2010 6:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
Nukes would be totally unfair, well...... if you had to gain a certain amount of points to get a nuke that would be kind of cool! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|